Psychological phenomena8/3/2023 ![]() ![]() We hope that this special collection of articles advances a conceptualization of deliberation as the process of how people understand and relate to one another. Delving into these topics moved deliberative theory away from a relatively sanitary perspective that a reasoned outcome is forged solely from disciplined argument, toward a messier view acknowledging the role that features such as goals, group and individual identity, and subjective positionality play in constituting reason. Sanders ( 1997), Young ( 1996, 2000), and others argued for the importance of emotions, passions, and affective processes such as sympathy and empathy for deliberation ( Barnes 2008 Chambers 2009 Dryzek 2010 Fleckenstein 2007 Goodin 2003 Hall 2005 Krause 2008 Morrell 2010 Thompson & Hoggett 2001). This special issue builds on foundational research into such processes by presenting six new articles advancing theory, empirical inquiry, and practice in those areas.Įarly theories of deliberation excluded or downplayed aspects of collective understanding influenced by affective-oriented speech. Something happens to citizens when they deliberate that does not happen when they watch the news, vote, or protest. Chambers 1996 Cohen 1989 Dewey 1927 Habermas 1996 Landemore 2013) rest to a considerable extent on psychological processes such as learning, perspective-taking, and attitude change. Yet normative accounts of deliberative democracy (e.g. Empirical research has sought to answer how best to facilitate that reasoning process, how to know when a decision is sufficiently reasoned, and how procedures and institutions can encourage well-reasoned decisions. One of the most compelling aspects of theories of democratic deliberation is their answers to the question: where does democratic legitimacy come from? The consent of the governed, deliberation theorists argue, comes from the understanding that emerges from interactions among citizens as they reason together. These articles offer novel theoretical and empirical insights on a number of current themes concerning psychological aspects of deliberation, while expanding knowledge concerning established areas of inquiry. Finally, this essay introduces the six new articles that make up this special issue. ![]() ![]() This essay summarizes key findings from prior research on psychological dimensions of deliberation, and then delineates recent deliberative scholarship that explores a broader range of psychological phenomena. Yet in recent years, the subject matter of psychological research on deliberation has expanded to include a wider array of issues, ranging from lay conceptualizations of deliberation, to phenomena not foregrounded in traditional political psychology scholarship, including emotions, social identity, communication goals, relational schemata, and social learning. Psychological phenomena have long been a focus of research on democratic deliberation, particularly concerning policy knowledge and attitudes and other issues addressed in conventional scholarship on political psychology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |